Friday, April 29, 2005


Infantile American Principle

David Gelernter (H/T to Betsy) summarizes the philosophy of the Democrats as it applies to their clients and all others (red emphases mine):

How could anyone be opposed in principle to private investment accounts within Social Security? I could understand Democrats arguing that "private accounts are a wonderful idea but the country can't afford the transition costs right now." But mostly I hear Democrats saying they're a lousy idea, and that President Bush wants to wreck Social Security — because, after all, he wants to let you keep a great big whopping 4% of your payroll taxes in a private account instead of handing over every cent to the government. How on Earth could anyone be opposed in principle to letting taxpayers manage a minuscule fraction of their own money (their own money, dammit!) if they want to? Because private accounts violate the Infantile American Principle, so dear to Democratic hearts. Little kids should turn over their cash to the Big Smart Government for safekeeping.

But of course they can't say that, so instead they say, "Bush wants to privatize Social Security" — as if government were going to wash its hands of the whole mess. The technical term that logicians use for this rhetorical gambit — applying a correct word for one part of a proposal to the proposal as a whole — is "lying."

Sunday, April 24, 2005


Senators and Cardinals

Mark Steyn contrasts the arrogance on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with the MSM expectations for the Pope:

I'll bet Pope Benedict XVI is glad that his conclave doesn't include either Cardinal Biden or Cardinal Voinovich, or his church would be pontiff-less indefinitely while they ''investigated'' last-minute rumors that he'd been off-hand to some guy in seminary 55 years ago. I had no strong views about the new pope one way or another, but I'd have voted for him just for the pleasure of seeing him drive the U.S. media bananas. Apparently, the New York Times was stunned that their short list of Cardinal Gloria Steinem, Cardinal Rupert Everett and Cardinal Rosie O'Donnell were defeated at the last moment by some guy who came out of left field and isn't even gay or female but instead belongs to the discredited ''Catholic'' faction of the Catholic Church.

Friday, April 22, 2005


Politically Correct?

Jay Ambrose pins the liberals down on this one:

Another word for ‘politically correct’ is ‘intolerant’

Guest Commentary

Thursday, April 21, 2005


Florida Judges

I hope it's only in Florida, where the Judges kill innocent women (Schiavo), and jail prospective jurors:

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) -- A judge sentenced a 19-year-old to four months in jail for not mentioning his arrest record when he was called for jury duty, outraging his family.

Sunday, April 17, 2005


Anger Management

Mark Steyn brings the Bolton confirmation smears into focus:

Fingar: I don't remember if he pointed. John speaks in such a low voice normally. Was it louder than normal? Probably. I wouldn't characterize it as screaming at me or anything like that. It was more, hands on hips, the body language as I recall it, I knew he was mad.

He was ''standing up'' with ''hands on hips''! Who's he think he is -- Carmen Miranda? Fortunately, before Bolton could let rip with a ''pursed lip'' or escalate to the lethal ''tsk-ing'' maneuver, Fingar was able to back cautiously out of the room and call the FBI anger management team, who surrounded the building and told the deranged diplomat to come out slowly with his hands above his hips.

Tuesday, April 12, 2005


Definition of liberals

Rich Lowry describes the anti-Bolton conspiracy in word that I can't pass up:

Bolton's key disagreement with those Democrats who are content to have the U.S. led by the nose by the lowest common denominator of recalcitrant foreign actors. This attitude is the international version of the old definition of a liberal as someone who won't take his own side in a fight.


Imperial Judges

Thomas Sowell understands the hypocrisy of those who dare question the absolute supremacy of the Judiciary and characterizes the Florida murder by judge accurately:

Over the past several decades, we have gotten used to judges being above the law, so it was perhaps inevitable that we would now be asked to get used to the idea that judges are above criticism.

In the wake of the Terri Schiavo case, where a Florida judge ignored Florida law and Congressional subpoenas, and where federal judges ignored Congressional legislation duly signed by the President, some people dared to suggest that judges had overstepped the bounds.

Saturday, April 09, 2005


Media Bias?

Dan at Riehl World wonders whether the NYT shows bias with this article. I believe h's nailed them again:

One has to wonder if Adam Nagourney of the NY Times would have felt compelled to write this piece had the consultant been a Democrat. Apparently Mr. Finkelstein wasn't exactly in the closet and chose a private civil ceremony. Somehow the story doesn't read like the usual Times wedding announcement.

Tuesday, April 05, 2005


Catholic Dogma or truth?

Mark Steyn, as usual, separates the liberal cries for "moderating the Church" from the propaganda aspects and cuts to the bone of the matter:

Thoughtful atheists ought to be able to recognise that, whatever one's tastes in these areas, the Pope was on to something - that abortion et al, in separating the "two meanings" of sex and leaving us free to indulge in one while ignoring the other, have severed us almost entirely and possibly irreparably from traditional impulses, such as societal survival. John Paul II championed the "splendour of truth" not because he was rigid and inflexible, but because he understood the alternative was a dead end in every sense.

Sunday, April 03, 2005



Mark Steyn sums up the "liberal position" on death and politics:

The Republicans did the right thing here, and they won't be punished for it by the electors. As with abortion, this will be an issue where the public moves slowly but steadily toward the conservative position: Terri Schiavo's court-ordered death will not be without meaning. As to "crack-ups," that's only a neurotic way of saying that these days most of the intellectual debate is within the right. If, like the Democrats, all you've got are lockstep litmus tests on race and abortion and all the rest, what's to crack up over? You just lose elections every two years, but carry on insisting, as Ted Kennedy does, that you're still the majority party. Ted's quite a large majority just by himself these days, but it's still not enough.

Friday, April 01, 2005


More left wing hate speech

I suppose "how dare you" would fit even if the slander was by Democratic hack Chris Matthews instead of Pat Buchanon - so typical of the hateful left and MSM - but that's repeating ourselves. We're finally back from South Florida - the state where the cops ticket handicapped cars and the judges kill handicapped people:

Hours before Terri Schiavo died yesterday, MSNBC "Hardball" host Chris Matthews said that he thought her father, Robert Schindler, was "having a good time" as his daughter starved.

< type="text/javascript" src="">

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
free hit counter - Alabama Weblogs